<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Molecule Eats Carbon Dioxide</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.carbonfund.org/blog/global-warming/molecule-eats-carbon-dioxide/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.carbonfund.org/blog/global-warming/molecule-eats-carbon-dioxide/</link>
	<description>Reduce What You Can, Offset What You Can't™</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 09:03:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: ASTM D6866</title>
		<link>http://www.carbonfund.org/blog/global-warming/molecule-eats-carbon-dioxide/comment-page-1/#comment-1140</link>
		<dc:creator>ASTM D6866</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbonfund.org/blog/?p=1849#comment-1140</guid>
		<description>I beg to differ, Scott. Biogenic CO2 is not &quot;bad&quot; as it is natural - animals respire biogenic CO2, plants absorb it, and biomass produces it when burned. The cycle goes on. It is anthropogenic CO2 that is considered as a greenhouse gas and can be viewed as the bad CO2 as it is not carbon-neutral. There is a reason why biogenic CO2 is deducted from greenhouse gas inventories while anthropogenic CO2 is capped. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I beg to differ, Scott. Biogenic CO2 is not &quot;bad&quot; as it is natural &#8211; animals respire biogenic CO2, plants absorb it, and biomass produces it when burned. The cycle goes on. It is anthropogenic CO2 that is considered as a greenhouse gas and can be viewed as the bad CO2 as it is not carbon-neutral. There is a reason why biogenic CO2 is deducted from greenhouse gas inventories while anthropogenic CO2 is capped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott</title>
		<link>http://www.carbonfund.org/blog/global-warming/molecule-eats-carbon-dioxide/comment-page-1/#comment-1013</link>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbonfund.org/blog/?p=1849#comment-1013</guid>
		<description>there is no &quot;bad&quot; CO2, just &quot;bad&quot; levels of it in the atmosphere - biogenic or anthropogenic doesn&#039;t matter. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there is no &quot;bad&quot; CO2, just &quot;bad&quot; levels of it in the atmosphere &#8211; biogenic or anthropogenic doesn&#039;t matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ASTM D6866</title>
		<link>http://www.carbonfund.org/blog/global-warming/molecule-eats-carbon-dioxide/comment-page-1/#comment-941</link>
		<dc:creator>ASTM D6866</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 16:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbonfund.org/blog/?p=1849#comment-941</guid>
		<description>There are two kinds of carbon dioxide - biogenic and anthropogenic. Biogenic or carbon-neutral CO2 is emitted by the combustion of biomass whereas anthropogenic CO2 is generated by the combustion of fossil carbon resources. Does this new molecule recognize which &quot;bad&quot; CO2 it should remove? Probably not. This molecule may remove the CO2 that the plants need for photosynthesis. Still, it is a very interesting discovery... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are two kinds of carbon dioxide &#8211; biogenic and anthropogenic. Biogenic or carbon-neutral CO2 is emitted by the combustion of biomass whereas anthropogenic CO2 is generated by the combustion of fossil carbon resources. Does this new molecule recognize which &quot;bad&quot; CO2 it should remove? Probably not. This molecule may remove the CO2 that the plants need for photosynthesis. Still, it is a very interesting discovery&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elizabeth</title>
		<link>http://www.carbonfund.org/blog/global-warming/molecule-eats-carbon-dioxide/comment-page-1/#comment-772</link>
		<dc:creator>elizabeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 01:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carbonfund.org/blog/?p=1849#comment-772</guid>
		<description>Obama must be stopped with his recent OK to log Tongas National Forest, another rainforest now at risk! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama must be stopped with his recent OK to log Tongas National Forest, another rainforest now at risk!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
