From the daily archives:

Wednesday, November 4, 2009

A survey of some of the nation’s top economists has revealed that nearly all of them favor taking action to fight global warming. Specifically, economists agree that global warming threatens the American economy and that cap-and-trade legislation will spur investment and be good for the economy.

Of the 144 economists surveyed by New York University of Law, some of the key findings include:

  • 84 percent of the economists agreed that climate change “presents a clear danger” to the United States and global economies;
  • 80.6 percent agree that a market-based approach of auctioning emissions allowances to limit carbon emissions;
  • 94.3 percent said the United States should agree to reduce greenhouse gas emissions through an international climate treaty. 57 percent said the country should make such a commitment even without any agreement;
  • 97 percent said that measures to reduce emissions would increase energy efficiency and promote innovation;
  • the “social cost” of carbon dioxide – the potential damage of warming on society – ranged from $20 to $100 a ton, with one estimate at $10 million.

What this survey indicates is that consensus regarding the impacts of global warming goes far beyond the scientific community. An economist’s agenda is generally to support rational policy that most benefits society. So this survey confirms what many of us have believed for years – that the potential cost of global warming far outweighs the benefits of coordinated actions to reduce emissions.

By increasing energy efficiency, businesses and individuals will not only reduce emissions but will also have more money to spend on more important things. Further, by spurring investment in clean energy technologies jobs will be created in strategic growth areas. Moreover, health care costs will be reduced when our air is cleaner – fewer asthma attacks means people are spending less on inhalers and spending more time at work.

Support a strong and vibrant economy. Fight global warming now.

{ 0 comments }

Climate Refugees

by Shira Silberg on November 4, 2009 · 0 comments

in Global Warming

tuvaluAs sea levels rise, the picture of a new kind of refugee emerges.  Climate refugees are people displaced by global warming and related environmental disasters. Hundreds of thousands of these refugees have already been displaced from permanently flooded coastal areas in places like Bohla Island in Bangladesh and the Carteret Islands in Papua New Guinea.  The 10,000 Tuvaluans living on the low island atoll of Tuvalu pictured here may be next.

But rising sea levels do not only affect these exotic far away places.  Nearly a quarter of the world’s population lives in low coastal areas.  Some of the world’s great cities like London, Miami, New York, New Orleans, Mumbai, Cairo, Amsterdam, Tokyo and Shanghai are vulnerable to rising sea levels.  According to Elaine Kurtenbach of the Associated Press, Chinese cities are among the largest and most threatened.  In Shanghai, developers seem to ignore this threat, and they are building new infrastructure on the densely populated coasts.  By 2070, experts estimate that nearly 150 million people will be living in areas vulnerable to flooding from rising sea levels.

Related Posts with Thumbnails

{ 0 comments }